Thursday, October 13, 2011

The Law Minister believes that arresting business persons affects investment. Would it be right to conclude that the corollary is that business people are not be arrested, even for crimes?

Coming from none other than the highest law officer directly responsible for rule of law, his thinking is perverse. No explanation, such as the ones being put out, would be of any use.

The explanation is that he was responding to media queries and was a "spur of the moment remark of general nature, and not specific to 2 G". This was in response to questions from the Supreme Court bench hearing the 2 G case.

With such thinking and obfuscation, would rule of law be possible in this country? 

No comments:

Post a Comment